chiming: (Default)
Li ([personal profile] chiming) wrote in [site community profile] dreamscapes 2012-01-20 08:02 pm (UTC)

Yeah, I see that. :|a TBH I didn't even mean to include the color option! It just showed up there automatically when I made use of the image property. I think that's a good idea, although...

Here's the thing: my background images are all clustered together, and they don't all make an easily explainable sense.



So that's why I decided to categorize them by their opacity, to try and make it easy for users to create approximate images of the same opacity if they were -- for example -- modifying my theme to use a light background and wanted to replace all the black images with pink images or something? :|a It's not a simple matter of "entry background", "footer background", etc.

.entry, .comment, .page-reply #postform,
body.page-tags #primary .inner { }

This declaration would translate into "Background for entries, comments, the reply box on the reply page, and the background on the tags page".

.entry .footer, .comment .footer, body.page-tags #primary .tags-container .manage-tags-link a, blockquote, .module-navlinks .current { }

This, "Background for entry/comment footer, tags page manage link, blockquote, and the current link on the navlinks module".

Any suggestions for this would be beloved. If I could do something about it, I could both clarify the descriptions of the transparencies and let users pick color replacements intelligently.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting